The most important decision an investor ever makes is the entry price of a deal. If that is right, then whatever happens in terms of timing thereafter will determine the relative success of the deal. But if you are in at the right price, then the dependency on that timing becomes far less relevant as you have bought at a level where you are happy to own, even if your business plan doesn’t materialise as you had anticipated.
The majority of capital today belongs to others. Once raised, if not spent within a time limit, it will have to be returned and so, to a certain extent, the market is full of forced buyers. Ironically, that acts to maintain values somewhat artificially. With inflation eroding cash, how long can a buyer hold back before investors start demanding their money back?
Through several dramatic cycles over nearly 40 years, I sometimes wonder what it is that at some stage in that cycle has convinced me it was a good time to buy. Once I have properly considered the macros, establishing what I would like — or more importantly not like — to buy, then it’s all about individual assets and their pricing. I am an investor of my own money, whether in whole or significant part, and so my decision determines more than just a performance statistic and must alter my decision process.
For most of my career, my initial question is not how much can I make but how much might I lose on a deal, because my default position is I could get the timing wrong and I might need to refinance (I need debt to invest) just at a time when credit markets are closed. So if, in my ‘Armaggedon’ scenario, we can still see our way through to a solvent future for the deal, which will always be nonrecourse funded, then at that point only do we begin to properly appraise the upside.
Underlying rents and values need to be stress tested, but I sense we have a generation of stress testers today who look at 5%-10% as the spread because they have no other experience.
I look at 30%-40% and explore what happens then. Conservatism born of hard and painful personal experience means I buy little, but when I do, I am pretty happy the shock absorbers we have put in place in terms of stress testing the asset and the debt we put around it with very cautious soft loan covenants ensures that the risk profile of the investment is as sound as we can make it. If we can’t make it quite work, then the probability is we won’t buy, or we will seriously limit our capital exposure to that deal.
As to when is that time to buy, the answer is when others are running scared, the investment market is at its weakest, and until you have a very strong sense of the recovery prospects of a particular asset or asset class. In real estate, you don’t often get a chance to shoot the lights out, and that is usually more a function of what markets are doing around us than individual brilliance on a particular deal where real value is created.
Quantitative easing has made many of us disproportionately and unworthily rich and my old mantra of ‘never confuse a bull market with a genius’ reminds me that most make money out of markets, but some possess genuine real estate skills.
Conventional market cycles have been sent out of kilter because of the GFC and QE, and vast fortunes have been made on the back of ownership alone in a negative interest rate environment. That is changing and we are about to experience a rising to the top of the best assets and companies, and a drop in value of pretty well everything else. For genuine property people, this will be a great time to go shopping, but not for the faint-hearted. It’s easy to buy in bull markets, but in the bear ones you need real courage.
I once read that the time to sell is when there is nothing but bright light at the end of the tunnel and the time to buy is when there is nothing but darkness there. That has worked OK for me.